Side-by-side comparison of Cobot 3000 (Future Robotics Inc.) and Magician Lite (Shenzhen Yuejiang Technology Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country

.png)
Year First Available

.png)
Verified Deployments

.png)
Price Range (USD)

.png)
Battery / Shift Runtime

.png)
Availability Status

.png)
Reach

.png)
Repeatability

.png)
Payload

.png)
IP Rating

.png)
Degrees of Freedom

.png)
Max TCP Speed

.png)
Robot Weight

.png)
Mounting Options

.png)
Safety Rating

.png)
Force/Torque Sensing

.png)
Programming Interface

.png)
Price (USD)

.png)
Lead Time

.png)
![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2023 | 2015 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $5,000 | $995–$999 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Reach (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 1,450 mm | 340 mm |
| Repeatability (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | ±0.1 mm | ±0.02 mm |
| Payload (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 10 kg | 0.3 kg |
| IP Rating (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | IP54 | — |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 6 | 4 |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | 2.5 m/s | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 39 kg | 2.4 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | floor/ceiling/wall | — |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | SIL3, Pl-e, Cat.3 safety function | — |
| Force/Torque Sensing | none | none |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Programming Interface (values differ) | Manual / Remote Control / Contact Information | code_python |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $5,000 | $995–$999 |
| Lead Time (values differ) | 6 wks | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, No-Code Capable, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Fieldbus Protocols, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Warranty
Frequently asked
Cobot 3000 is made by Future Robotics Inc.. Magician Lite is made by Shenzhen Yuejiang Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN.
Cobot 3000 launched in 2023. Magician Lite launched in 2015.
Cobot 3000 scores 56/100. Magician Lite scores 54/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Cobot 3000 has a reach of 1300 mm. Magician Lite has a reach of 340 mm.
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Cobot 3000 vs Magician Lite compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.