Dr.01 vs KUAVO 3.0
Side-by-side comparison of Dr.01 (Hangzhou DEEP Robotics Co., Ltd.) and KUAVO 3.0 (Leju (Shenzhen) Robotics Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 Dr.01humanoidHangzhou DEEP Robotics Co., Ltd.—Trust Score |  KUAVO 3.0humanoidLeju (Shenzhen) Robotics Co., Ltd.—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2024 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | US$90,000 | US$30,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | — | 7 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1700 mm | 1750 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 80 kg | 60 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.6 m/s | 4.6 m/s |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | demo only | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | rough_indoor, mild_incline | both |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload | 10 kg | 10 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 12 | 26 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 14 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | — | 10 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | AI processing integrates sensor data and environmental inputs, running real-time adaptive control and learning algorithms. | Embedded platform with KaihongOS |
| Programming (values differ) | — | code_ros, proprietary_app |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | — | 7 hrs |
| Safety | ||
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | code_ros, proprietary_app |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | prototype | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $90,000 | $30,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 20-40K | 30-40K |
| Pricing Model | purchase | purchase |
| Applications (values differ) | research, industrial productivity, hazardous_env | smart_home, industrial_manufacturing, public/commercial_service, smart_healthcare |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
Dr.01 vs KUAVO 3.0 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.