Eva vs Hubo 2
Side-by-side comparison of Eva (Hanson Robotics) and Hubo 2 (KAIST) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 EvahumanoidHanson Robotics10.0Trust Score |  Hubo 2humanoidKAIST13.3Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Hong Kong | KR |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2014 | 2009 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $23,000 | $400,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 8 hrs | 1.5 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 167 mm | 1250 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 9.5 kg | 55 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | — |
| Walking Speed | 1.5 m/s | 1.5 m/s |
| Terrain | both | both |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 0.6 kg | 2 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 83 | 40 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 15 | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 10 | 5 |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | independent | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | NVIDIA Jetson Xavier AGX | Two PC/104 embedded computers with solid-state drives |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | Intel i7 | — |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | cloud only | — |
| Programming (values differ) | visual_block, code_python | code_ros, proprietary_app, teleoperation |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | 1.5 hrs |
| Safety | ||
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | vision human | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | visual_block, code_python | code_ros, proprietary_app, teleoperation |
| ROS Support | Yes | Yes |
| Open API | Yes | Yes |
| Air-Gap Capable (values differ) | No | — |
| Reliability | ||
| IP Rating (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | IP20 | — |
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | production pilot | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $23,000 | $400,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 40-80K | 150K+ |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | pre-order | purchase |
| Warranty (values differ) | 1 yrs | — |
| Applications (values differ) | machine_tending, inspection, quality_control_checks, research | robotics education, research, service robotics, disaster response |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
About this comparison
Eva vs Hubo 2 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.