Figure 02 vs NEO
Side-by-side comparison of Figure 02 (Figure AI) and NEO (1X Technologies AS) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 Figure 02humanoidFigure AI56.7Trust Score |  NEOhumanoid1X Technologies AS61.8Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | US | US |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2024 | 2026 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $26,970 | $20,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 167.64 mm | 1676.4 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 70 kg | 29.9 kg |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | service humanoid |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.2 m/s | 1.4 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor, mild_incline | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 20 kg | 25 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | 25 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 40 | 52 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 16 | 22 |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | independent | — |
| Tool Use (values differ) | vendor demo | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | High-performance onboard computer (Details Awaiting Confirmation) | 1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor) |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | Tesla custom | — |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | onboard large | — |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | Helix | 1X World Model |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | single task | — |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | teleoperation | — |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, code_ros, teleoperation | voice, mobile app |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | 2.3 kWh | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | No | — |
| Safety | ||
| Force-Limited Arms (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | vision human | — |
| Safe Speed Near Humans (values differ) | software_defined | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, C++ | voice, mobile app |
| ROS Support (values differ) | none | — |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | NVIDIA Omniverse | — |
| Open API (values differ) | limited rest | — |
| Air-Gap Capable (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | production pilot | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $26,970 | $20,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 80-150K | <10K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | capex | purchase |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 3 yrs |
| Production Pilots (values differ) | BMW Spartanburg | — |
| Applications (values differ) | warehouse_transport, manufacturing, hazardous_env | cleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitality |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Charging Time, Charging Method, Avg Power Consumption, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time
About this comparison
Figure 02 vs NEO compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.