Moonlight parallel robot vs QUICKLOCK
Side-by-side comparison of Moonlight parallel robot (Flexiv Ltd.) and QUICKLOCK (Rausch) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 Moonlight parallel robotcobotFlexiv Ltd.61.8Trust Score |  QUICKLOCKcobotRausch41.2Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | Germany |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2016 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $32,500 | Contact for quote |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Reach (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 1,200 mm | — |
| Repeatability (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | ±0.05 mm | — |
| Payload (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 38 kg | 12.5 kg |
| IP Rating (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | IP65 | — |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 3 | — |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | 1.5 m/s | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 7 kg | — |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | any | floor, wall, fork, handlebar |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | EN ISO 13849-1 | NSF/ANSI Standard 61 certified for potable water, ASTM F3110-14 |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Programming Interface (values differ) | no_code_gui | — |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | Modbus TCP, Ethernet TCP/IP, Profinet, EtherNet/IP | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $32,500 | Contact for quote |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, No-Code Capable, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
About this comparison
Moonlight parallel robot vs QUICKLOCK compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.