FP95-50 vs TriOrb Omnidirectional Robot
Side-by-side comparison of FP95-50 (SIASUN) and TriOrb Omnidirectional Robot (TriOrb Inc.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Agriculture buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
FP95-50CN
TriOrb Omnidirectional RobotJP
Year First Available
- FP95-50—
- TriOrb Omnidirectional Robot2023
Verified Deployments
- FP95-500 Deployments
- TriOrb Omnidirectional Robot0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- FP95-506 hrs
- TriOrb Omnidirectional Robot3.5 hrs
Availability Status
- FP95-50ACTIVE
- TriOrb Omnidirectional RobotACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- FP95-5050 kg
- TriOrb Omnidirectional Robot300 kg
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- FP95-50lidar slam,qr code
- TriOrb Omnidirectional Robotvision
| FP95-50amr-warehouseSIASUN 38.8Trust Score | TriOrb Omnidirectional Robotamr-warehouseTriOrb Inc. 40.1Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | JP |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2023 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | 6 hrs | 3.5 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | 50 kg | 300 kg |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | lidar slam,qr code | vision |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), AMR Subtype, Length, Width, Turning Radius, Min Aisle Width, Ground Clearance, Robot Weight, Localization Accuracy, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Pedestrian Detection, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Chemistry, Battery Capacity, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Warranty, Expected Service Life
About this comparison
FP95-50 vs TriOrb Omnidirectional Robot compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.