George vs NEO
Side-by-side comparison of George (Tony Sale) and NEO (1X Technologies AS) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
George—
NEOUS
Year First Available
- George—
- NEO2026
Verified Deployments
- George0 Deployments
- NEO0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- George$779
- NEO$20,000
Battery / Shift Runtime
- George—
- NEO4 hrs
Availability Status
- GeorgeACTIVE
- NEOACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Weight
- George—
- NEO29.9 kg
Height
- George1829 mm
- NEO1676.4 mm
Mobility Type
- George—
- NEObipedal
Humanoid Subtype
- George—
- NEOservice humanoid
Walking Speed
- George—
- NEO1.4 m/s
Terrain
- George—
- NEOflat_indoor
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- George—
- NEO25 kg
Total DOF
- George—
- NEO52
Arm DOF
- George—
- NEO7
Hand DOF
- George—
- NEO22
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- George—
- NEO1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor)
Foundation Models
- George—
- NEO1X World Model
Programming
- George—
- NEOvoice, mobile app
Battery & Power
Runtime
- George—
- NEO4 hrs
Software
SDK Languages
- George—
- NEOvoice, mobile app
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- George—
- NEOprototype
Commercial
Price (USD)
- George$779
- NEO$20,000
Price Tier
- George10-20K
- NEO<10K
Pricing Model
- Georgepurchase
- NEOpurchase
Warranty
- George—
- NEO3 yrs
Applications
- George—
- NEOcleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitality
| GeorgehumanoidTony Sale 27.9Trust Score | NEOhumanoid1X Technologies AS 61.8Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | US |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2026 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $779 | $20,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | — | 4 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Weight (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | — | 29.9 kg |
| Height (values differ) | 1829 mm | 1676.4 mm |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | — | service humanoid |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 1.4 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | — | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 25 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | — | 52 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | — | 22 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | 1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor) |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | — | 1X World Model |
| Programming (values differ) | — | voice, mobile app |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | — | 4 hrs |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | voice, mobile app |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $779 | $20,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 10-20K | <10K |
| Pricing Model | purchase | purchase |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 3 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | — | cleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitality |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
About this comparison
George vs NEO compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.