Side-by-side comparison of GP88 (Yaskawa) and PG6X-0550-1544-1400 (Shandong UMW Technology Co., Ltd) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country


Year First Available


Verified Deployments


Price Range (USD)


Availability Status


Repeatability


Reach


Payload


Degrees of Freedom


Max TCP Speed


Robot Weight


Cycle Time (25/305/25)


MTBF


Duty Cycle


Internal Cable Routing


Pneumatic Lines


Electrical Lines


Price (USD)


Service Network


![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Japan | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2023 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $25,999 |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Repeatability (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) (values differ) | ±0.03 mm | ±0.015 mm |
| Reach (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) (values differ) | — | 550 mm |
| Payload (values differ) | — | 6 kg |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 6 | 4 |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | — | 7.4 m/s |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | — | 33 kg |
| Performance | ||
| Cycle Time (25/305/25) (values differ) | — | 0.4 s |
| MTBF (values differ) | 28 hrs | — |
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | — | not specified |
| End-Effector | ||
| Internal Cable Routing (values differ) | through arm | — |
| Pneumatic Lines (values differ) | — | 3 |
| Electrical Lines (values differ) | — | 16 |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $25,999 |
| Service Network (values differ) | global | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Path Accuracy, IP Rating (Arm), IP Rating (Wrist), Vibration Damping, Safety Category, Dual Check Safety, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Controller Model, Programming Languages, Teach Pendant Type, Offline Programming, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, ROS-Industrial Support, IoT / Cloud Platform, Cybersecurity Certs, Predictive Maintenance, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer (ISO), Warranty, Spare Parts Lead Time, Expected Service Life
Frequently asked
GP88 is made by Yaskawa, based in JP. PG6X-0550-1544-1400 is made by Shandong UMW Technology Co., Ltd.
GP88 scores 49/100. PG6X-0550-1544-1400 scores 56/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
GP88 has a reach of 2236 mm. PG6X-0550-1544-1400 has a reach of 550 mm.
Both robots are classified as Industrial Arm on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Industrial Arm TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming
7 min readIndustrial Arms
Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points
9 min readIndustrial Arms
Programming Approaches: Teach Pendant, Offline, AI-Assisted — What Each Costs You
8 min readIndustrial Arms
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
GP88 vs PG6X-0550-1544-1400 compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.