HAL vs ROBODOC
Side-by-side comparison of HAL (Cyberdyne and University of Tsukuba) and ROBODOC (Integrated Surgical Systems) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 HALsurgical-medicalCyberdyne and University of Tsukuba—Trust Score |  ROBODOCsurgical-medicalIntegrated Surgical Systems—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Japan | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2004 | 1992 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $635,000–$1,500,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 1 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Reach (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) (values differ) | — | 800 mm |
| Payload Capacity (values differ) | 100 kg | 5 kg |
| Autonomy Level (values differ) | fully autonomous | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Max Speed, IP Rating
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
HAL vs ROBODOC compares two robots in the surgical-medical category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.