Hobbs W1 vs TOPIO Dio
Side-by-side comparison of Hobbs W1 (Noetix) and TOPIO Dio (Yoyodyne) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
Hobbs W1CN
TOPIO Dio—
Year First Available
- Hobbs W12025
- TOPIO Dio2010
Verified Deployments
- Hobbs W10 Deployments
- TOPIO Dio0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- Hobbs W1$320
- TOPIO Dio$95
Battery / Shift Runtime
- Hobbs W16 hrs
- TOPIO Dio12 hrs
Availability Status
- Hobbs W1ACTIVE
- TOPIO DioACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Weight
- Hobbs W175 kg
- TOPIO Dio45 kg
Height
- Hobbs W11700 mm
- TOPIO Dio1250 mm
Walking Speed
- Hobbs W11.2 m/s
- TOPIO Dio5.6 m/s
Terrain
- Hobbs W1indoor
- TOPIO Dioindoor
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- Hobbs W12 kg
- TOPIO Dio50 kg
Total DOF
- Hobbs W111
- TOPIO Dio28
Arm DOF
- Hobbs W15
- TOPIO Dio—
Hand DOF
- Hobbs W16
- TOPIO Dio—
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- Hobbs W1RK 3588
- TOPIO Dio—
Programming
- Hobbs W1—
- TOPIO Dioremote_control
Battery & Power
Runtime
- Hobbs W16 hrs
- TOPIO Dio12 hrs
Software
SDK Languages
- Hobbs W1—
- TOPIO Dioremote_control
Commercial
Price (USD)
- Hobbs W1$320
- TOPIO Dio$95
Price Tier
- Hobbs W120-40K
- TOPIO Dio80-150K
Pricing Model
- Hobbs W1purchase
- TOPIO Dio—
Warranty
- Hobbs W12 yrs
- TOPIO Dio—
Applications
- Hobbs W1hospitality, retail, education, corporate
- TOPIO Diocleaning, food preparation, entertainment, valet service
| Hobbs W1humanoidNoetix 43.9Trust Score | TOPIO DiohumanoidYoyodyne 55.8Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2010 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $320 | $95 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 6 hrs | 12 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Weight (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 75 kg | 45 kg |
| Height (values differ) | 1700 mm | 1250 mm |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.2 m/s | 5.6 m/s |
| Terrain | indoor | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 2 kg | 50 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 11 | 28 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 5 | — |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 6 | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | RK 3588 | — |
| Programming (values differ) | — | remote_control |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 6 hrs | 12 hrs |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | remote_control |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $320 | $95 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 20-40K | 80-150K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | — |
| Warranty (values differ) | 2 yrs | — |
| Applications (values differ) | hospitality, retail, education, corporate | cleaning, food preparation, entertainment, valet service |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Mobility Type, Humanoid Subtype, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
Hobbs W1 vs TOPIO Dio compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.