HRP-4C vs KUAVO 3.0
Side-by-side comparison of HRP-4C (AIST) and KUAVO 3.0 (Leju (Shenzhen) Robotics Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 HRP-4ChumanoidAIST10.0Trust Score |  KUAVO 3.0humanoidLeju (Shenzhen) Robotics Co., Ltd.—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | JP | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2009 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | — | US$30,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | — | 7 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 158 mm | 1750 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 46 kg | 60 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 0.5 m/s | 4.6 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | static walk | — |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | none | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | both |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 0.5 kg | 10 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 42 | 26 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 6 | 14 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 2 | 10 |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | independent | — |
| Tool Use (values differ) | none | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Intel Pentium M 1.6 GHz | Embedded platform with KaihongOS |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | none | — |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | single task | — |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | motion_capture | — |
| Programming (values differ) | motion_capture, teleoperation | code_ros, proprietary_app |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | — | 7 hrs |
| Safety | ||
| Force-Limited Arms (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | vision human | — |
| Safe Speed Near Humans (values differ) | none | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | motion_capture, teleoperation | code_ros, proprietary_app |
| ROS Support (values differ) | none | — |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | OpenHRP3 | — |
| Open API (values differ) | closed | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | prototype | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | — | $30,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | — | 30-40K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | — | purchase |
| Applications (values differ) | entertainment, research | smart_home, industrial_manufacturing, public/commercial_service, smart_healthcare |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Compute Platform, Foundation Models, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
HRP-4C vs KUAVO 3.0 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.