Humanoid Robot vs NEO
Side-by-side comparison of Humanoid Robot (Kinco Corporation) and NEO (1X Technologies AS) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 Humanoid RobothumanoidKinco Corporation55.8Trust Score |  NEOhumanoid1X Technologies AS61.8Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | US |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2026 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $75,000 | $20,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 8 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Weight (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 75 kg | 29.9 kg |
| Height (values differ) | 1750 mm | 1676.4 mm |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | wheeled | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | wheeled humanoid | service humanoid |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.1 m/s | 1.4 m/s |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | none | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 10 kg | 25 kg |
| Total DOF | 52 | 52 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 5 | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 11 | 22 |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | independent | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | KeplerBrain | 1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor) |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | — | 1X World Model |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | multi task | — |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python | voice, mobile app |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Charging Method (values differ) | auto dock | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | code_python | voice, mobile app |
| Air-Gap Capable (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity | prototype | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $75,000 | $20,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 40-80K | <10K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | capex | purchase |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 3 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | industrial production, commercial services, scientific research and education, material handling | cleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitality |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
About this comparison
Humanoid Robot vs NEO compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.