MiniCobo vs QUICKLOCK
Side-by-side comparison of MiniCobo (Shanghai JAKA Robotics Co., Ltd.) and QUICKLOCK (Rausch) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 MiniCobocobotShanghai JAKA Robotics Co., Ltd.64.1Trust Score |  QUICKLOCKcobotRausch40.1Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | DE |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2014 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $13,313 | Contact for quote |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 1 kg | 12.5 kg |
| Robot Weight (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 9.4 kg | — |
| Max TCP Speed (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 1.5 m/s | — |
| Reach (values differ) | 580 mm | — |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 6 | — |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.1 mm | — |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | At any angle | floor, wall, fork, handlebar |
| IP Rating (values differ) | IP40 | — |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | CE (Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC, EMC, RED), RoHS, KCs, GB 11291.1-2011, ISO 10218-1:2011 | NSF/ANSI Standard 61 certified for potable water, ASTM F3110-14 |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Programming Interface (values differ) | proprietary_app | — |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | TCP/IP, Modbus TCP, Modbus RTU, Profinet | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $13,313 | Contact for quote |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Force/Torque Sensing, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, No-Code Capable, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
About this comparison
MiniCobo vs QUICKLOCK compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.