MiniCobo vs UR16e
Side-by-side comparison of MiniCobo (Shanghai JAKA Robotics Co., Ltd.) and UR16e (Universal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne)) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
MiniCoboCN
UR16eDK
Year First Available
- MiniCobo2014
- UR16e2019
Verified Deployments
- MiniCobo0 Deployments
- UR16e0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- MiniCobo$13,313
- UR16eContact for quote
Availability Status
- MiniCoboACTIVE
- UR16eACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Payload
- MiniCobo1 kg
- UR16e—
Robot Weight
- MiniCobo9.4 kg
- UR16e—
Max TCP Speed
- MiniCobo1.5 m/s
- UR16e—
Reach
- MiniCobo580 mm
- UR16e—
Degrees of Freedom
- MiniCobo6
- UR16e6
Repeatability
- MiniCobo±0.1 mm
- UR16e—
Mounting Options
- MiniCoboAt any angle
- UR16e—
IP Rating
- MiniCoboIP40
- UR16e—
Safety
Safety Rating
- MiniCoboCE (Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC, EMC, RED), RoHS, KCs, GB 11291.1-2011, ISO 10218-1:2011
- UR16eCE, ISO/TS 15066
Force/Torque Sensing
- MiniCobo—
- UR16ejoint level all
Ease of Use
Setup Time
- MiniCobo—
- UR16e1 hrs
No-Code Capable
- MiniCobo—
- UR16eYes
Programming Interface
- MiniCoboproprietary_app
- UR16eteach_pendant, drag_and_drop
Software & Connectivity
Fieldbus Protocols
- MiniCoboTCP/IP, Modbus TCP, Modbus RTU, Profinet
- UR16e—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- MiniCobo$13,313
- UR16eContact for quote
| MiniCobocobotShanghai JAKA Robotics Co., Ltd. 64.1Trust Score | UR16ecobotUniversal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne) 59.1Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | DK |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2014 | 2019 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $13,313 | Contact for quote |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 1 kg | — |
| Robot Weight (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 9.4 kg | — |
| Max TCP Speed (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 1.5 m/s | — |
| Reach (values differ) | 580 mm | — |
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | 6 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.1 mm | — |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | At any angle | — |
| IP Rating (values differ) | IP40 | — |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | CE (Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC, EMC, RED), RoHS, KCs, GB 11291.1-2011, ISO 10218-1:2011 | CE, ISO/TS 15066 |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | — | joint level all |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Setup Time (values differ) | — | 1 hrs |
| No-Code Capable (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | proprietary_app | teach_pendant, drag_and_drop |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | TCP/IP, Modbus TCP, Modbus RTU, Profinet | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $13,313 | Contact for quote |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Time to Redeploy, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
Trade-offs at a glance
About this comparison
MiniCobo vs UR16e compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.