Justin vs NEO
Side-by-side comparison of Justin (Unknown) and NEO (1X Technologies AS) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
Justin—
NEOUS
Year First Available
Justin2008
NEO2026
Verified Deployments
Justin0 Deployments
NEO0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
Justin$45
NEO$20,000
Battery / Shift Runtime
Justin1 hrs
NEO4 hrs
Availability Status
JustinACTIVE
NEOACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
Justin1910 mm
NEO1676.4 mm
Weight
Justin200 kg
NEO29.9 kg
Mobility Type
Justin—
NEObipedal
Humanoid Subtype
Justinnull
NEOservice humanoid
Walking Speed
Justin2 m/s
NEO1.4 m/s
Terrain
Justinboth
NEOflat_indoor
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
Justin20 kg
NEO25 kg
Total DOF
Justin51
NEO52
Arm DOF
Justin7
NEO7
Hand DOF
Justin12
NEO22
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
Justin—
NEO1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor)
Foundation Models
Justin—
NEO1X World Model
Programming
Justin—
NEOvoice, mobile app
Battery & Power
Runtime
Justin1 hrs
NEO4 hrs
Software
SDK Languages
Justin—
NEOvoice, mobile app
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
Justin—
NEOprototype
Commercial
Price (USD)
Justin$45
NEO$20,000
Price Tier
Justin<10K
NEO<10K
Pricing Model
Justin—
NEOpurchase
Warranty
Justin—
NEO3 yrs
Applications
Justinhousehold_work, assisting_astronauts
NEOcleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitality
JustinhumanoidUnknown46.5Trust Score | NEOhumanoid1X Technologies AS61.8Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | US |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2008 | 2026 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $45 | $20,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 1 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1910 mm | 1676.4 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 200 kg | 29.9 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | null | service humanoid |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 2 m/s | 1.4 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | both | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 20 kg | 25 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 51 | 52 |
| Arm DOF | 7 | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 12 | 22 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | 1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor) |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | — | 1X World Model |
| Programming (values differ) | — | voice, mobile app |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 1 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | voice, mobile app |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $45 | $20,000 |
| Price Tier | <10K | <10K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | — | purchase |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 3 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | household_work, assisting_astronauts | cleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitality |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
About this comparison
Justin vs NEO compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.