Keenon XMAN R1 vs NEO Gamma
Side-by-side comparison of Keenon XMAN R1 (KEENON) and NEO Gamma (1X Technologies AS) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
CN
US
Year First Available
—
2025
Verified Deployments
0 Deployments
0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
$100,000
$75,000
Battery / Shift Runtime
3 hrs
—
Availability Status
ACTIVE
ACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Weight
110 kg
30.3 kg
Height
172 mm
1650 mm
Mobility Type
bipedal
—
Humanoid Subtype
service humanoid
—
Walking Speed
0.8 m/s
1.4 m/s
Terrain
flat_indoor
indoor
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
3 kg
68 kg
Payload (Peak)
3 kg
—
Total DOF
36
75
Hand DOF
10
22
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
—
NVIDIA Robotics Platform
Battery & Power
Runtime
3 hrs
—
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
production pilot
—
Commercial
Price (USD)
$100,000
$75,000
Price Tier
80-150K
40-80K
Pricing Model
purchase
purchase
Applications
hospitality, logistics, property operations
eldercare_assistance, cleaning
 Keenon XMAN R1humanoidKEENON56.5Trust Score |  NEO Gammahumanoid1X Technologies AS59.5Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | US |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2025 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $100,000 | $75,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 3 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Weight (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 110 kg | 30.3 kg |
| Height (values differ) | 172 mm | 1650 mm |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | service humanoid | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 0.8 m/s | 1.4 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 3 kg | 68 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | 3 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 36 | 75 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 10 | 22 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | NVIDIA Robotics Platform |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 3 hrs | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | production pilot | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $100,000 | $75,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 80-150K | 40-80K |
| Pricing Model | purchase | purchase |
| Applications (values differ) | hospitality, logistics, property operations | eldercare_assistance, cleaning |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Arm DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Programming, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, SDK Languages, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
Keenon XMAN R1 vs NEO Gamma compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.