Side-by-side comparison of KR 810 (Kassow Robots ApS) and noid (Robot.com) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country
Year First Available
Verified Deployments
Price Range (USD)
Availability Status
Payload
Robot Weight
Max TCP Speed
Reach
Degrees of Freedom
Repeatability
Mounting Options
IP Rating
Safety Rating
Force/Torque Sensing
Duty Cycle
No-Code Capable
Offline Programming
Programming Interface
Integrated F/T Sensor
ROS Compatible
Price (USD)
CaaS / Month
Lead Time
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Denmark | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2025 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $29,100 | $20,000 |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 10 kg | 5 kg |
| Robot Weight (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 23.5 kg | 50 kg |
| Max TCP Speed (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 1 m/s | 1.7 m/s |
| Reach (values differ) | 850 mm | 1,180 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 7 | 22 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.1 mm | — |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | floor, ceiling, wall | — |
| IP Rating (values differ) | IP54 | — |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | CE, ISO/TS 15066 | — |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | joint level all | Yes |
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | 24 7 continuous | — |
| Ease of Use | ||
| No-Code Capable (values differ) | No | Yes |
| Offline Programming | No | No |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | no_code_gui | voice, proprietary_app |
| End-Effector | ||
| Integrated F/T Sensor (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| ROS Compatible | Yes | Yes |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $29,100 | $20,000 |
| CaaS / Month (values differ) | $1,000 | $499 |
| Lead Time (values differ) | — | 6 wks |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, Fieldbus Protocols, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, Warranty
Frequently asked
KR 810 is made by Kassow Robots ApS, based in DK. noid is made by Robot.com, based in CN.
KR 810 is listed at $29,100. noid is listed at $20,000.
KR 810 scores 45/100. noid scores 53/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
KR 810 has a reach of 850 mm. noid has a reach of 1180 mm.
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
KR 810 vs noid compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.