KUAVO 3.0 vs CL-1 biped
Side-by-side comparison of KUAVO 3.0 (Leju (Shenzhen) Robotics Co., Ltd.) and CL-1 biped (Shenzhen LimX Dynamics Technology Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
 KUAVO 3.0humanoidLeju (Shenzhen) Robotics Co., Ltd.—Trust Score |  CL-1 bipedhumanoidShenzhen LimX Dynamics Technology Co., Ltd.—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | CN |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2022 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | US$30,000 | US$40,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 7 hrs | 3 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1750 mm | 180 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 60 kg | 70 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | — | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 4.6 m/s | 0.6 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | — | run capable |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | — | production ready |
| Terrain (values differ) | both | flat_indoor, mild_incline, rough_indoor, outdoor_unstructured |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 10 kg | 55 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | — | 18 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 26 | 30 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 14 | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 10 | 6 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Embedded platform with KaihongOS | — |
| Programming (values differ) | code_ros, proprietary_app | code_python, SDK |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 7 hrs | 3 hrs |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | code_ros, proprietary_app | code_python, SDK |
| Open API (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $30,000 | $40,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 30-40K | price on request |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | — |
| Applications (values differ) | smart_home, industrial_manufacturing, public/commercial_service, smart_healthcare | research, teleoperation |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
KUAVO 3.0 vs CL-1 biped compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.