L7 vs Mirax Robots
Side-by-side comparison of L7 (Beijing RobotEra Technology Co., Ltd.) and Mirax Robots (Mirax) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 L7humanoidBeijing RobotEra Technology Co., Ltd.—Trust Score |  Mirax RobotshumanoidMirax—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $6,500 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 6 hrs | 7 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1710 mm | 68 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | — | 38 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | wheeled |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | — | service humanoid |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 4 m/s | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 20 kg | 10 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 55 | 22 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Dual processor architecture with 80 TOPS for AI inference. | Android |
| Programming (values differ) | code_ros, proprietary_app | API/SDK, voice |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 6 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Charging Time (values differ) | — | 5 hrs |
| Charging Method (values differ) | — | auto dock |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | — | No |
| Safety | ||
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | — | vision human |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | code_ros, proprietary_app | Python |
| ROS Support (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Open API (values differ) | Yes | limited rest |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $6,500 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | — | <10K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | — | purchase |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 1 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | industrial_automation, research, entertainment | hospitality, research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm DOF, Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
About this comparison
L7 vs Mirax Robots compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.