Side-by-side comparison of LARA 3 (NEURA Robotics) and UR16e (Universal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne)) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Manufacturer Country


Year First Available


Verified Deployments


Price Range (USD)


Availability Status


Payload


Reach


Degrees of Freedom


Repeatability


Robot Weight


Mounting Options


IP Rating


Safety Rating


Force/Torque Sensing


Setup Time


No-Code Capable


Offline Programming


Programming Interface


Fieldbus Protocols


Price (USD)


CaaS / Month


![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Germany | Denmark |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2019 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $16,500 | Contact for quote |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 14 kg | 16 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | 1,400 mm | 900 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | — | 6 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.01 mm | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 53 kg | 33.1 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | all directions | — |
| IP Rating (values differ) | IP65 | — |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | PLd 3, SIL3 | CE, ISO/TS 15066 |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | integrated wrist ft | joint level all |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Setup Time (values differ) | — | 1 hrs |
| No-Code Capable | Yes | Yes |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | No | — |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | visual_block, no_code_gui, proprietary_app | teach_pendant, drag_and_drop |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | EtherCAT, Modbus TCP | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $16,500 | Contact for quote |
| CaaS / Month (values differ) | $1,000 | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Max TCP Speed, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Time to Redeploy, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, Warranty, Lead Time
Frequently asked
LARA 3 is made by NEURA Robotics, based in DE. UR16e is made by Universal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne), based in DK.
LARA 3 scores 52/100. UR16e scores 59/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
LARA 3 vs UR16e compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.