LY-3-100T-612-B vs QuickTote tote-pick
Side-by-side comparison of LY-3-100T-612-B (Lonyu Agv Co., Ltd) and QuickTote tote-pick (Shanghai Quicktron Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- LY-3-100T-612-B—
- QuickTote tote-pickChina
Year First Available
- LY-3-100T-612-B2008
- QuickTote tote-pick2014
Verified Deployments
- LY-3-100T-612-B0 Deployments
- QuickTote tote-pick0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- LY-3-100T-612-B6 hrs
- QuickTote tote-pick8 hrs
Availability Status
- LY-3-100T-612-BACTIVE
- QuickTote tote-pickACTIVE
Cross-Category Comparison
Showing shared foundation fields. Select robots from the same category for full spec comparison.
| QuickTote tote-pickamr-warehouseShanghai Quicktron Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. 45.2Product Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2008 | 2014 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 6 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
Cross-Category Comparison Showing shared foundation fields. Select robots from the same category for full spec comparison. | ||
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Reach, IP Rating, Autonomy Level
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes LY-3-100T-612-B and QuickTote tote-pick?
LY-3-100T-612-B is made by Lonyu Agv Co., Ltd. QuickTote tote-pick is made by Shanghai Quicktron Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN.
When were LY-3-100T-612-B and QuickTote tote-pick launched?
LY-3-100T-612-B launched in 2008. QuickTote tote-pick launched in 2014.
How do LY-3-100T-612-B and QuickTote tote-pick compare on the Robolist Product Score?
LY-3-100T-612-B scores 46/100. QuickTote tote-pick scores 45/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
What is the payload difference between LY-3-100T-612-B and QuickTote tote-pick?
LY-3-100T-612-B carries up to 3000 kg. QuickTote tote-pick carries up to 2000 kg.
Are LY-3-100T-612-B and QuickTote tote-pick comparable?
LY-3-100T-612-B is categorized as Agv; QuickTote tote-pick as Amr Warehouse. The Product Score is calculated per category, so the absolute scores reflect their respective category tiers.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Agv And Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Agv And Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AGV TCO: hardware, infrastructure, and maintenance.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between LY-3-100T-612-B and QuickTote tote-pick?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AGV RFP red flags: avoiding vendor lock-in.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AGV TCO: hardware, infrastructure, and maintenance
10 min readAGVs
AGV RFP red flags: avoiding vendor lock-in
10 min readAGVs
Running an AGV pilot: what should pass and what should fail it
9 min readAGVs
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
About this comparison
LY-3-100T-612-B vs QuickTote tote-pick compares two robots in the agv and amr-warehouse categories. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.