Side-by-side comparison of LPH-040 (DENSO) and Racer-3-0.63 (Comau) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country


Year First Available


Verified Deployments


Price Range (USD)


Availability Status


Payload


Robot Weight


Reach


Degrees of Freedom


Repeatability


Max TCP Speed


IP Rating (Arm)


Duty Cycle


Controller Model


Teach Pendant Type


Offline Programming


Tool Flange Standard


Pneumatic Lines


Electrical Lines


Price (USD)


Service Network


Expected Service Life


![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Japan | Italy |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2019 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $5,392 | Contact for quote |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) | 3 kg | 3 kg |
| Robot Weight (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 16 kg | 30 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | 400 mm | 630 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 4 | 6 |
| Repeatability | ±0.02 mm | ±0.02 mm |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | 4.7 m/s | — |
| IP Rating (Arm) (values differ) | — | IP54 |
| Performance | ||
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | multi shift | — |
| Controller & Programming | ||
| Controller Model (values differ) | RC8 | R1C |
| Teach Pendant Type (values differ) | no pendant (browser UI) | wired touch |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | WINCAPS III Offline Software | — |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | — | ISO 9409-1 |
| Pneumatic Lines (values differ) | 3 | — |
| Electrical Lines (values differ) | 15 | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $5,392 | Contact for quote |
| Service Network | global | global |
| Expected Service Life (values differ) | 5 yrs | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Path Accuracy, IP Rating (Wrist), Cycle Time (25/305/25), MTBF, Vibration Damping, Safety Category, Dual Check Safety, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Programming Languages, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, ROS-Industrial Support, IoT / Cloud Platform, Cybersecurity Certs, Predictive Maintenance, Tool Changer (ISO), Internal Cable Routing, Warranty, Spare Parts Lead Time
Frequently asked
LPH-040 is made by DENSO, based in JP. Racer-3-0.63 is made by Comau, based in IT.
LPH-040 scores 63/100. Racer-3-0.63 scores 49/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
LPH-040 has a reach of 400 mm. Racer-3-0.63 has a reach of 630 mm.
Both robots are classified as Industrial Arm on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Industrial Arm TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming
7 min readIndustrial Arms
Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points
9 min readIndustrial Arms
Programming Approaches: Teach Pendant, Offline, AI-Assisted — What Each Costs You
8 min readIndustrial Arms
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
LPH-040 vs Racer-3-0.63 compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.