LPH-040 vs YK-XGP
Side-by-side comparison of LPH-040 (DENSO) and YK-XGP (Yamaha Motor) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Agriculture buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- LPH-040Japan
- YK-XGP—
Year First Available
- LPH-0402019
- YK-XGP—
Verified Deployments
- LPH-0400 Deployments
- YK-XGP0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- LPH-040$5,392
- YK-XGPContact for quote
Availability Status
- LPH-040ACTIVE
- YK-XGPACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Payload
- LPH-0403 kg
- YK-XGP—
Reach
- LPH-040400 mm
- YK-XGP—
Degrees of Freedom
- LPH-0404
- YK-XGP4
Repeatability
- LPH-040±0.02 mm
- YK-XGP±0.01 mm
Max TCP Speed
- LPH-0404.7 m/s
- YK-XGP—
Robot Weight
- LPH-04016 kg
- YK-XGP—
Performance
MTBF
- LPH-040—
- YK-XGP50,000 hrs
Duty Cycle
- LPH-040multi shift
- YK-XGPcontinuous 24 7
Safety
Safety Category
- LPH-040—
- YK-XGPCat.3 PLd
Dual Check Safety
- LPH-040—
- YK-XGPNo
Controller & Programming
Controller Model
- LPH-040RC8
- YK-XGP—
Programming Languages
- LPH-040—
- YK-XGPYamaha RCX (proprietary), Python
Teach Pendant Type
- LPH-040no pendant (browser UI)
- YK-XGPwired touch
Offline Programming
- LPH-040WINCAPS III Offline Software
- YK-XGPRCX Manager
Digital Twin Support
- LPH-040—
- YK-XGPNo
Connectivity
ROS-Industrial Support
- LPH-040—
- YK-XGPvendor supported
IoT / Cloud Platform
- LPH-040—
- YK-XGPYamaha Connect
Predictive Maintenance
- LPH-040—
- YK-XGPthreshold based
End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- LPH-040—
- YK-XGPISO 9409-1
Tool Changer (ISO)
- LPH-040—
- YK-XGPnone
Internal Cable Routing
- LPH-040—
- YK-XGPthrough arm
Pneumatic Lines
- LPH-0403
- YK-XGP4
Electrical Lines
- LPH-04015
- YK-XGP8
Commercial
Price (USD)
- LPH-040$5,392
- YK-XGPContact for quote
Service Network
- LPH-040global
- YK-XGPglobal
Expected Service Life
- LPH-0405 yrs
- YK-XGP10 yrs
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Japan | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2019 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $5,392 | Contact for quote |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | 3 kg | — |
| Reach (values differ) | 400 mm | — |
| Degrees of Freedom | 4 | 4 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.02 mm | ±0.01 mm |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | 4.7 m/s | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 16 kg | — |
| Performance | ||
| MTBF (values differ) | — | 50,000 hrs |
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | multi shift | continuous 24 7 |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Category (values differ) | — | Cat.3 PLd |
| Dual Check Safety (values differ) | — | No |
| Controller & Programming | ||
| Controller Model (values differ) | RC8 | — |
| Programming Languages (values differ) | — | Yamaha RCX (proprietary), Python |
| Teach Pendant Type (values differ) | no pendant (browser UI) | wired touch |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | WINCAPS III Offline Software | RCX Manager |
| Digital Twin Support (values differ) | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| ROS-Industrial Support (values differ) | — | vendor supported |
| IoT / Cloud Platform (values differ) | — | Yamaha Connect |
| Predictive Maintenance (values differ) | — | threshold based |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | — | ISO 9409-1 |
| Tool Changer (ISO) (values differ) | — | none |
| Internal Cable Routing (values differ) | — | through arm |
| Pneumatic Lines (values differ) | 3 | 4 |
| Electrical Lines (values differ) | 15 | 8 |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $5,392 | Contact for quote |
| Service Network | global | global |
| Expected Service Life (values differ) | 5 yrs | 10 yrs |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Path Accuracy, IP Rating (Arm), IP Rating (Wrist), Cycle Time (25/305/25), Vibration Damping, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Communication Protocols, Cybersecurity Certs, Warranty, Spare Parts Lead Time
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes LPH-040 and YK-XGP?
LPH-040 is made by DENSO, based in JP. YK-XGP is made by Yamaha Motor.
How do LPH-040 and YK-XGP compare on the Robolist Product Score?
LPH-040 scores 63/100. YK-XGP scores 19/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of LPH-040 compare to YK-XGP?
LPH-040 has a reach of 400 mm. YK-XGP has a reach of 1000 mm.
Are LPH-040 and YK-XGP in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Industrial Arm on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Industrial Arm robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Industrial Arm TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between LPH-040 and YK-XGP?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming
7 min readIndustrial Arms
Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points
9 min readIndustrial Arms
Programming Approaches: Teach Pendant, Offline, AI-Assisted — What Each Costs You
8 min readIndustrial Arms
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
About this comparison
LPH-040 vs YK-XGP compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.