Magic Panda vs MagicBot Gen1
Side-by-side comparison of Magic Panda (Magiclab Robotics Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd.) and MagicBot Gen1 (Magiclab Robotics Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Agriculture buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
| Magic PandahumanoidMagiclab Robotics Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd. 0.0Trust Score | MagicBot Gen1humanoidMagiclab Robotics Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd. 22.3Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | CN | CN |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | — | 3 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 65 mm | 174 mm |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | — | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 1.1 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | — | dynamic walk |
| Terrain (values differ) | — | flat_indoor, mild_incline, rough_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 7.5 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | — | 40 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | — | 42 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | — | 6 |
| Arm Reach (values differ) | — | 80 cm |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | — | coordinated planning |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | 100 TOPS |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | — | multi task |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | — | joystick |
| Programming (values differ) | — | teleoperation, code_python, proprietary_app |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | — | 3 hrs |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | — | 1.4 kWh |
| Charging Time (values differ) | — | 3 hrs |
| Safety | ||
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | — | multi modal |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | teleoperation, code_python, proprietary_app |
| Open API (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Commercial | ||
| Applications (values differ) | — | warehouse_transport, assembly, inspection |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Price Range (USD), Weight, Stair Climbing, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, IP Rating, Noise Level, Price (USD), Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
Magic Panda vs MagicBot Gen1 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.