Metalman vs Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision
Side-by-side comparison of Metalman (Monash University) and Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision (UBTECH Robotics Corp Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
Metalman—
Walker Tienkung Voice and VisionCN
Year First Available
- Metalman2021
- Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision—
Verified Deployments
- Metalman0 Deployments
- Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- Metalman$185
- Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision$65,000
Battery / Shift Runtime
- Metalman800 hrs
- Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision3 hrs
Availability Status
- MetalmanACTIVE
- Walker Tienkung Voice and VisionACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- Metalman—
- Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision1720 mm
Weight
- Metalman1.5 kg
- Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision—
Walking Speed
- Metalman—
- Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision2 m/s
Terrain
- Metalmanoutdoor
- Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision—
Payload & Dexterity
Total DOF
- Metalman—
- Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision21
Arm DOF
- Metalman—
- Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision4
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- Metalman—
- Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision275 TOPS
Battery & Power
Runtime
- Metalman800 hrs
- Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision3 hrs
Reliability
IP Rating
- MetalmanIP65
- Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- Metalman$185
- Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision$65,000
Price Tier
- Metalman10-20K
- Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision40-80K
Pricing Model
- Metalmanpurchase
- Walker Tienkung Voice and Visionpurchase
Warranty
- Metalman1 yrs
- Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision1 yrs
Applications
- Metalmantelecommunication, broadcasting, industry, military
- Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision—
| MetalmanhumanoidMonash University 46.5Trust Score | Walker Tienkung Voice and VisionhumanoidUBTECH Robotics Corp Ltd. 46.4Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | CN |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2021 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $185 | $65,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 800 hrs | 3 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | — | 1720 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 1.5 kg | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 2 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | outdoor | — |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Total DOF (values differ) | — | 21 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 4 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | 275 TOPS |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 800 hrs | 3 hrs |
| Reliability | ||
| IP Rating (values differ) | IP65 | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $185 | $65,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 10-20K | 40-80K |
| Pricing Model | purchase | purchase |
| Warranty | 1 yrs | 1 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | telecommunication, broadcasting, industry, military | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Mobility Type, Humanoid Subtype, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload, Payload (Peak), Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Programming, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, SDK Languages, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
Metalman vs Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.