Mirax Robots vs Pibo
Side-by-side comparison of Mirax Robots (Mirax) and Pibo (Circulus Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 Mirax RobotshumanoidMirax—Trust Score |  PibohumanoidCirculus Co., Ltd.—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | South Korea |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2020 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $6,500 | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 7 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 68 mm | 250 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 38 kg | — |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | wheeled | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | service humanoid | bipedal |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 10 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 22 | 10 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Android | 1.4Ghz quad-core chip |
| Programming (values differ) | API/SDK, voice | voice, QR code, dashboard app |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Charging Time (values differ) | 5 hrs | — |
| Charging Method (values differ) | auto dock | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | No | — |
| Safety | ||
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | vision human | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python | voice, QR code, dashboard app |
| Open API (values differ) | limited rest | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $6,500 | Contact for quote |
| Price Tier (values differ) | <10K | — |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | — |
| Warranty (values differ) | 1 yrs | — |
| Applications (values differ) | hospitality, research | museum interaction |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Walking Speed, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm DOF, Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
About this comparison
Mirax Robots vs Pibo compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.