NAO V6 vs Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision
Side-by-side comparison of NAO V6 (RobotLAB) and Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision (UBTECH Robotics Corp Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Cleaning & Facilities buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 NAO V6humanoidRobotLAB42.9Trust Score |  Walker Tienkung Voice and VisionhumanoidUBTECH Robotics Corp Ltd.46.4Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | FR | CN |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $16,990 | $65,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | — | 3 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | — | 1720 mm |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 2 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | — |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Total DOF (values differ) | 25 | 21 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 4 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | ATOM E3845 1.91 GHz, Quad core | 275 TOPS |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, code_c++, code_javascript, drag_and_drop | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | — | 3 hrs |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | code_python, code_c++, code_javascript, drag_and_drop | — |
| Open API (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $16,990 | $65,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 20-40K | 40-80K |
| Pricing Model | purchase | purchase |
| Warranty | 1 yrs | 1 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | education, healthcare, customer_service, entertainment | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Weight, Mobility Type, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload, Payload (Peak), Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
About this comparison
NAO V6 vs Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.