NEO vs 中型直线电缸QTI25-06-45
Side-by-side comparison of NEO (1X Technologies AS) and 中型直线电缸QTI25-06-45 (诺仕机器人) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
NEOUS
中型直线电缸QTI25-06-45—
Year First Available
- NEO2026
- 中型直线电缸QTI25-06-45—
Verified Deployments
- NEO0 Deployments
- 中型直线电缸QTI25-06-450 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- NEO$20,000
- 中型直线电缸QTI25-06-45Contact for quote
Battery / Shift Runtime
- NEO4 hrs
- 中型直线电缸QTI25-06-45—
Availability Status
- NEOACTIVE
- 中型直线电缸QTI25-06-45ACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- NEO1676.4 mm
- 中型直线电缸QTI25-06-45—
Weight
- NEO29.9 kg
- 中型直线电缸QTI25-06-45—
Mobility Type
- NEObipedal
- 中型直线电缸QTI25-06-45—
Humanoid Subtype
- NEOservice humanoid
- 中型直线电缸QTI25-06-45人形机器人灵巧手手腕
Walking Speed
- NEO1.4 m/s
- 中型直线电缸QTI25-06-45—
Terrain
- NEOflat_indoor
- 中型直线电缸QTI25-06-45—
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- NEO25 kg
- 中型直线电缸QTI25-06-45—
Total DOF
- NEO52
- 中型直线电缸QTI25-06-45—
Arm DOF
- NEO7
- 中型直线电缸QTI25-06-45—
Hand DOF
- NEO22
- 中型直线电缸QTI25-06-45—
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- NEO1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor)
- 中型直线电缸QTI25-06-45—
Foundation Models
- NEO1X World Model
- 中型直线电缸QTI25-06-45—
Programming
- NEOvoice, mobile app
- 中型直线电缸QTI25-06-45—
Battery & Power
Runtime
- NEO4 hrs
- 中型直线电缸QTI25-06-45—
Software
SDK Languages
- NEOvoice, mobile app
- 中型直线电缸QTI25-06-45—
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- NEOprototype
- 中型直线电缸QTI25-06-45—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- NEO$20,000
- 中型直线电缸QTI25-06-45Contact for quote
Price Tier
- NEO<10K
- 中型直线电缸QTI25-06-45—
Pricing Model
- NEOpurchase
- 中型直线电缸QTI25-06-45—
Warranty
- NEO3 yrs
- 中型直线电缸QTI25-06-45—
Applications
- NEOcleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitality
- 中型直线电缸QTI25-06-45—
| NEOhumanoid1X Technologies AS 61.8Trust Score | 中型直线电缸QTI25-06-45humanoid诺仕机器人 0.0Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | US | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2026 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $20,000 | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 4 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1676.4 mm | — |
| Weight (values differ) | 29.9 kg | — |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | service humanoid | 人形机器人灵巧手手腕 |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.4 m/s | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | — |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 25 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 52 | — |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | — |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 22 | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor) | — |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | 1X World Model | — |
| Programming (values differ) | voice, mobile app | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 4 hrs | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | voice, mobile app | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | prototype | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $20,000 | Contact for quote |
| Price Tier (values differ) | <10K | — |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | — |
| Warranty (values differ) | 3 yrs | — |
| Applications (values differ) | cleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitality | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
NEO vs 中型直线电缸QTI25-06-45 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.