NEO vs TORO
Side-by-side comparison of NEO (1X Technologies AS) and TORO (DLR) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
NEOUS
TORODE
Year First Available
- NEO2026
- TORO2013
Verified Deployments
- NEO0 Deployments
- TORO0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- NEO$20,000
- TOROContact for quote
Battery / Shift Runtime
- NEO4 hrs
- TORO1 hrs
Availability Status
- NEOACTIVE
- TOROACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- NEO1676.4 mm
- TORO—
Weight
- NEO29.9 kg
- TORO—
Mobility Type
- NEObipedal
- TORO—
Humanoid Subtype
- NEOservice humanoid
- TORO—
Walking Speed
- NEO1.4 m/s
- TORO—
Terrain
- NEOflat_indoor
- TORO—
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- NEO25 kg
- TORO—
Total DOF
- NEO52
- TORO—
Arm DOF
- NEO7
- TORO—
Hand DOF
- NEO22
- TORO—
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- NEO1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor)
- TORO—
Foundation Models
- NEO1X World Model
- TORO—
Programming
- NEOvoice, mobile app
- TORO—
Battery & Power
Runtime
- NEO4 hrs
- TORO—
Software
SDK Languages
- NEOvoice, mobile app
- TORO—
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- NEOprototype
- TORO—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- NEO$20,000
- TOROContact for quote
Price Tier
- NEO<10K
- TORO—
Pricing Model
- NEOpurchase
- TORO—
Warranty
- NEO3 yrs
- TORO—
Applications
- NEOcleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitality
- TORO—
| NEOhumanoid1X Technologies AS 61.8Trust Score | TOROhumanoidDLR 46.5Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | US | DE |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2026 | 2013 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $20,000 | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 4 hrs | 1 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1676.4 mm | — |
| Weight (values differ) | 29.9 kg | — |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | service humanoid | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.4 m/s | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | — |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 25 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 52 | — |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | — |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 22 | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor) | — |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | 1X World Model | — |
| Programming (values differ) | voice, mobile app | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 4 hrs | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | voice, mobile app | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | prototype | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $20,000 | Contact for quote |
| Price Tier (values differ) | <10K | — |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | — |
| Warranty (values differ) | 3 yrs | — |
| Applications (values differ) | cleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitality | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
About this comparison
NEO vs TORO compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.