NEO vs Unitree H1
Side-by-side comparison of NEO (1X Technologies AS) and Unitree H1 (Unitree Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 NEOhumanoid1X Technologies AS61.8Trust Score |  Unitree H1humanoidUnitree Robotics60.1Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | US | CN |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2026 | 2023 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $20,000 | $100,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 4 hrs | 1 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Weight (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 29.9 kg | 47 kg |
| Height (values differ) | 1676.4 mm | 180 mm |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | service humanoid | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.4 m/s | 3.3 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | — | demo only |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | — | production ready |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | flat_indoor, mild_incline, rough_indoor, outdoor_unstructured |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 25 kg | 10 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | — | 15 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 52 | 26 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | 4 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 22 | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor) | Motion Control Computing Unit (i5-1235U), Development Computing Unit (i7-1255U / i7-1265U) |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | — | Intel i7 processors |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | 1X World Model | — |
| Programming (values differ) | voice, mobile app | api, sdk |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 4 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | — | 0.9 kWh |
| Charging Method (values differ) | — | manual swap |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | — | multi modal |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | voice, mobile app | Python, C++, ROS2 |
| ROS Support (values differ) | — | ros2 vendor |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | — | Gazebo |
| Open API (values differ) | — | limited rest |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | prototype | production pilot |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $20,000 | $100,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | <10K | 20-40K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | capex |
| Developer Unit Price (values differ) | — | $27,730 |
| Warranty (values differ) | 3 yrs | — |
| Applications (values differ) | cleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitality | research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, VLM Capable, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Charging Time, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
About this comparison
NEO vs Unitree H1 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.