Skip to content
Robolist.ai

NP-MD vs piCLASSIC™ Neo

Side-by-side comparison of NP-MD (NPACK) and piCLASSIC™ Neo (Piab) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.

View saved

Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.

NP-MDcobotNPACK
Trust Score
piCLASSIC™ NeopiCLASSIC™ NeocobotPiab
Trust Score
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Year First Available (values differ)2025
Verified Deployments0 Deployments0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability StatusACTIVEACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
Arm Mechanics
Repeatability (values differ)±0.04 mm
Mounting Options (values differ)flush mounting, direct mount, End-of-Arm-Tooling
Safety
Safety Rating (values differ)CE
Force/Torque Sensing (values differ)Yes
Duty Cycle (values differ)24 7 continuous
Ease of Use
Setup Time (values differ)2 hrs
No-Code Capable (values differ)Yes
Programming Interface (values differ)visual_block, no_code_gui
End-Effector
Tool Changer Support (values differ)manual
Integrated F/T Sensor (values differ)Yes
Wrist Power Supply (values differ)compressed air
Software & Connectivity
ROS Compatible (values differ)No
Digital Twin Support (values differ)Yes

Insufficient data for full comparison

The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Manufacturer Country, Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Payload, Reach, Degrees of Freedom, Max TCP Speed, Robot Weight, IP Rating, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Time to Redeploy, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, SDK Languages, Fieldbus Protocols, MTBF, Path Accuracy, Price (USD), CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time

best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ

About this comparison

NP-MD vs piCLASSIC™ Neo compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.