Skip to content
Robolist.ai

NP-MD vs TQ HPR 120S

Side-by-side comparison of NP-MD (NPACK) and TQ HPR 120S (TQ-Group) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.

View saved

Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.

NP-MDcobotNPACK
Trust Score
TQ HPR 120STQ HPR 120ScobotTQ-Group
Trust Score
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country (values differ)Germany
Year First Available (values differ)2012
Verified Deployments0 Deployments0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability StatusACTIVEACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
Arm Mechanics
Repeatability (values differ)±0.04 mm
Robot Weight (values differ)3.9 kg
Safety
Force/Torque Sensing (values differ)Yes
Ease of Use
Setup Time (values differ)2 hrs
Programming Interface (values differ)visual_block, no_code_gui

Insufficient data for full comparison

The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Payload, Reach, Degrees of Freedom, Max TCP Speed, Mounting Options, IP Rating, Safety Rating, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Time to Redeploy, No-Code Capable, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Fieldbus Protocols, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, Price (USD), CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time

best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ

About this comparison

NP-MD vs TQ HPR 120S compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.