Side-by-side comparison of Paletizadores Robóticos Colaborativos RP-10 (Guangdong Imako Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd.) and TORU (Magazino) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country


Year First Available


Verified Deployments


Battery / Shift Runtime


Availability Status


Cross-Category Comparison
Showing shared foundation fields. Select robots from the same category for full spec comparison.
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | Germany |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2016 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | — | 9 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
Cross-Category Comparison Showing shared foundation fields. Select robots from the same category for full spec comparison. | ||
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD)
Frequently asked
Paletizadores Robóticos Colaborativos RP-10 is made by Guangdong Imako Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd., based in CN. TORU is made by Magazino, based in DE.
Paletizadores Robóticos Colaborativos RP-10 scores 26/100. TORU scores 55/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Paletizadores Robóticos Colaborativos RP-10 has a reach of 1600 mm. TORU has a reach of 2500 mm.
Paletizadores Robóticos Colaborativos RP-10 is categorized as Cobot; TORU as Amr Warehouse. The Product Score is calculated per category, so the absolute scores reflect their respective category tiers.
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot And Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Paletizadores Robóticos Colaborativos RP-10 vs TORU compares two robots in the cobot and amr-warehouse categories. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.