Petman vs Wildcat
Side-by-side comparison of Petman (Boston Dynamics, Inc. (Hyundai Motor Group subsidiary)) and Wildcat (Boston Dynamics, Inc. (Hyundai Motor Group subsidiary)) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
 PetmanhumanoidBoston Dynamics, Inc. (Hyundai Motor Group subsidiary)60.1Trust Score |  WildcathumanoidBoston Dynamics, Inc. (Hyundai Motor Group subsidiary)68.7Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | US | US |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2009 | 2011 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $24,999 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | — | 4 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 175 mm | 1900 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 79.4 kg | 11 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | anthropomorphic torso | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 2 m/s | 8.5 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | run capable | — |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | production ready | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor, mild_incline, rough_indoor, outdoor_unstructured | both |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 32 kg | 30 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | 50 kg | — |
| Total DOF | 56 | 56 |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | full bimanual | — |
| Tool Use (values differ) | production validated | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Custom PC | — |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | none | — |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | multi task | — |
| Programming (values differ) | teleoperation | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | — | 4 hrs |
| Charging Method (values differ) | auto dock | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Safety | ||
| Force-Limited Arms (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | vision human | — |
| Safe Speed Near Humans (values differ) | software_defined | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | teleoperation | — |
| Open API (values differ) | limited rest | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | prototype | — |
| IP Rating (values differ) | water and dustproof | IP67 |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $24,999 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 150K+ | 20-40K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | — |
| Production Pilots (values differ) | HMGMA | — |
| Applications (values differ) | research | warehouse_transport, teleoperation |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Arm DOF, Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Compute Platform, Foundation Models, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Avg Power Consumption, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
Petman vs Wildcat compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.