PG6X vs UR16e
Side-by-side comparison of PG6X (QKM Technologies) and UR16e (Universal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne)) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- PG6XChina
- UR16eDenmark
Year First Available
- PG6X2023
- UR16e2019
Verified Deployments
- PG6X0 Deployments
- UR16e0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
- PG6XACTIVE
- UR16eACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Reach
- PG6X1,050 mm
- UR16e900 mm
Repeatability
- PG6X±0.015 mm
- UR16e—
Payload
- PG6X20 kg
- UR16e16 kg
Degrees of Freedom
- PG6X4
- UR16e6
Robot Weight
- PG6X—
- UR16e33.1 kg
Mounting Options
- PG6Xinverted
- UR16e—
Safety
Safety Rating
- PG6X—
- UR16eCE, ISO/TS 15066
Force/Torque Sensing
- PG6XYes
- UR16ejoint level all
Ease of Use
Setup Time
- PG6X—
- UR16e1 hrs
No-Code Capable
- PG6X—
- UR16eYes
Programming Interface
- PG6X—
- UR16eteach_pendant, drag_and_drop
Software & Connectivity
Fieldbus Protocols
- PG6XModbus TCP
- UR16e—
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | Denmark |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2023 | 2019 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Reach (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 1,050 mm | 900 mm |
| Repeatability (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | ±0.015 mm | — |
| Payload (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 20 kg | 16 kg |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 4 | 6 |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | — | 33.1 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | inverted | — |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | — | CE, ISO/TS 15066 |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | Yes | joint level all |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Setup Time (values differ) | — | 1 hrs |
| No-Code Capable (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | — | teach_pendant, drag_and_drop |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | Modbus TCP | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Max TCP Speed, IP Rating, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Time to Redeploy, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, Price (USD), CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes PG6X and UR16e?
PG6X is made by QKM Technologies, based in CN. UR16e is made by Universal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne), based in DK.
When were PG6X and UR16e launched?
PG6X launched in 2023. UR16e launched in 2019.
How do PG6X and UR16e compare on the Robolist Product Score?
PG6X scores 56/100. UR16e scores 59/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of PG6X compare to UR16e?
PG6X has a reach of 550 mm. UR16e has a reach of 900 mm.
Are PG6X and UR16e in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between PG6X and UR16e?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
About this comparison
PG6X vs UR16e compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.