piCLASSIC™ Neo vs SZGH-1820-A
Side-by-side comparison of piCLASSIC™ Neo (Piab) and SZGH-1820-A (Shenzhen Guanhong Automation Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Cleaning & Facilities buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 piCLASSIC™ NeocobotPiab—Trust Score |  SZGH-1820-AcobotShenzhen Guanhong Automation Co., Ltd.—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $1,999–$12,688 |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Max TCP Speed (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | — | 4 m/s |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | — | 6 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | — | ±0.05 mm |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | flush mounting, direct mount, End-of-Arm-Tooling | — |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | CE | CE |
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | 24 7 continuous | — |
| Ease of Use | ||
| No-Code Capable (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | — | teach_pendant |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Changer Support (values differ) | manual | — |
| Integrated F/T Sensor (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Wrist Power Supply (values differ) | compressed air | — |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| ROS Compatible (values differ) | No | — |
| Digital Twin Support (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $1,999–$12,688 |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Payload, Reach, Robot Weight, IP Rating, Force/Torque Sensing, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, SDK Languages, Fieldbus Protocols, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
About this comparison
piCLASSIC™ Neo vs SZGH-1820-A compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.