Side-by-side comparison of QuickTote tote-pick (Shanghai Quicktron Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.) and Swift (IAM Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country

Year First Available

Verified Deployments

Battery / Shift Runtime

Availability Status

Cross-Category Comparison
Showing shared foundation fields. Select robots from the same category for full spec comparison.
![]() QuickTote tote-pickamr-warehouseShanghai Quicktron Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. 45.2Product Score | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | United States |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2014 | 2018 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) | 8 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
Cross-Category Comparison Showing shared foundation fields. Select robots from the same category for full spec comparison. | ||
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Reach, IP Rating, Autonomy Level
Frequently asked
QuickTote tote-pick is made by Shanghai Quicktron Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN. Swift is made by IAM Robotics, based in US.
QuickTote tote-pick launched in 2014. Swift launched in 2018.
QuickTote tote-pick scores 45/100. Swift scores 17/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
QuickTote tote-pick carries up to 2000 kg. Swift carries up to 18.14 kg.
QuickTote tote-pick is categorized as Amr Warehouse; Swift as Mobile Manipulator. The Product Score is calculated per category, so the absolute scores reflect their respective category tiers.
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse And Mobile Manipulator TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
The mobile manipulator vendor RFP: questions and red flags
10 min readMobile Manipulators
A 90-day playbook for your first mobile manipulation task
9 min readMobile Manipulators
QuickTote tote-pick vs Swift compares two robots in the amr-warehouse and mobile-manipulator categories. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.