RANGER MINI 3.0 vs TRACER 2.0
Side-by-side comparison of RANGER MINI 3.0 (Agilex) and TRACER 2.0 (Agilex) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Agriculture buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- RANGER MINI 3.0China
- TRACER 2.0China
Verified Deployments
- RANGER MINI 3.00 Deployments
- TRACER 2.00 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- RANGER MINI 3.0$13,696
- TRACER 2.0$2,490
Battery / Shift Runtime
- RANGER MINI 3.08 hrs
- TRACER 2.010 hrs
Availability Status
- RANGER MINI 3.0ACTIVE
- TRACER 2.0ACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
IP Rating
- RANGER MINI 3.0IP54
- TRACER 2.0—
Payload Capacity
- RANGER MINI 3.0100 kg
- TRACER 2.0150 kg
Max Speed
- RANGER MINI 3.02 m/s
- TRACER 2.02 m/s
Autonomy Level
- RANGER MINI 3.0semi-autonomous
- TRACER 2.0—
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | China | China |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $13,696 | $2,490 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | 8 hrs | 10 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| IP Rating (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | IP54 | — |
| Payload Capacity (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | 100 kg | 150 kg |
| Max Speed | 2 m/s | 2 m/s |
| Autonomy Level (values differ) | semi-autonomous | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Reach
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes RANGER MINI 3.0 and TRACER 2.0?
RANGER MINI 3.0 is made by Agilex, based in CN. TRACER 2.0 is made by Agilex, based in CN.
How do RANGER MINI 3.0 and TRACER 2.0 compare on the Robolist Product Score?
RANGER MINI 3.0 scores 54/100. TRACER 2.0 scores 34/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
What is the payload difference between RANGER MINI 3.0 and TRACER 2.0?
RANGER MINI 3.0 carries up to 100 kg. TRACER 2.0 carries up to 150 kg.
Are RANGER MINI 3.0 and TRACER 2.0 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Agv on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Agv robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Agv TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AGV TCO: hardware, infrastructure, and maintenance.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between RANGER MINI 3.0 and TRACER 2.0?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AGV RFP red flags: avoiding vendor lock-in.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AGV TCO: hardware, infrastructure, and maintenance
10 min readAGVs
AGV RFP red flags: avoiding vendor lock-in
10 min readAGVs
Running an AGV pilot: what should pass and what should fail it
9 min readAGVs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
About this comparison
RANGER MINI 3.0 vs TRACER 2.0 compares two robots in the agv category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.