TORO vs Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision
Side-by-side comparison of TORO (DLR) and Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision (UBTECH Robotics Corp Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Cleaning & Facilities buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
TORODE
Walker Tienkung Voice and VisionCN
Year First Available
- TORO2013
- Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision—
Verified Deployments
- TORO0 Deployments
- Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- TOROContact for quote
- Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision$65,000
Battery / Shift Runtime
- TORO1 hrs
- Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision3 hrs
Availability Status
- TOROACTIVE
- Walker Tienkung Voice and VisionACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- TORO—
- Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision1720 mm
Walking Speed
- TORO—
- Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision2 m/s
Payload & Dexterity
Total DOF
- TORO—
- Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision21
Arm DOF
- TORO—
- Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision4
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- TORO—
- Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision275 TOPS
Battery & Power
Runtime
- TORO—
- Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision3 hrs
Commercial
Price (USD)
- TOROContact for quote
- Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision$65,000
Price Tier
- TORO—
- Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision40-80K
Pricing Model
- TORO—
- Walker Tienkung Voice and Visionpurchase
Warranty
- TORO—
- Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision1 yrs
| TOROhumanoidDLR 46.5Trust Score | Walker Tienkung Voice and VisionhumanoidUBTECH Robotics Corp Ltd. 46.4Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | DE | CN |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2013 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $65,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 1 hrs | 3 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | — | 1720 mm |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 2 m/s |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Total DOF (values differ) | — | 21 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 4 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | 275 TOPS |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | — | 3 hrs |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $65,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | — | 40-80K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | — | purchase |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 1 yrs |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Weight, Mobility Type, Humanoid Subtype, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Terrain, Payload, Payload (Peak), Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Programming, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, SDK Languages, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots, Applications
About this comparison
TORO vs Walker Tienkung Voice and Vision compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.