Skip to content
Robots, Ranked.

Warehouse AMR · companies · scores as of 6 Sept 2026

Top Warehouse AMR Companies

157 makers, ranked on their warehouse amr robots alone — not on their size, their funding, or how much of their catalogue we happen to hold. The robot standing ranks the machines themselves.

Gold · #1

Seegrid

73.57

73.57 score

best robot 69.7 · 5 ranked robots

Silver · #2

Locus Robotics

73.20

68.51 score + 4.69 momentum

best robot 65.2 · 4 ranked robots

Bronze · #3

Geekplus

72.54

72.54 score

best robot 67.5 · 15 ranked robots

#CompanyScoreMoment.RoboIndex
4Hairou Innovation11r71.8871.88
5Amazon Robotics1r63.20+7.2570.45
6SIASUN30r70.3370.33
7NEURA Robotics3r61.45+7.8069.25
8MiR5r68.9868.98
9Hyundai Motor1r62.66+5.8468.50
10Dane4r67.3867.38
11ForwardX Robotics3r64.58+2.4267.00
12Robotnik2r66.7666.76
13Rainbow4r66.7366.73
14RuanYi5r66.3266.32
15PAL Robotics2r66.2266.22
16Clearpath Robotics3r65.84+0.0965.93
17MūL Technologies1r65.9365.93
18Cyberdyne1r65.24+0.5365.77
19Reeman Intelligent9r65.6865.68
20Ocado Intelligent Automation1r65.6465.64
21Big Joe Forklifts1r65.1565.15
22Smart Electromechanical5r64.5564.55
23Jungheinrich2r61.96+1.6363.59
24Jiecang1r63.3663.36
25Gongboshi Robot2r63.3363.33
26Zebra5r63.2063.20
27Balyo1r63.0663.06
28Syrius4r62.8362.83
29Vecna Robotics5r58.67+4.0962.76
30Symbotic1r60.09+2.6762.76
31AutoStore4r57.08+5.6462.72
33ABB1r57.14+5.2262.36
34OTTO Motors3r62.3362.33
36Yujin Robot5r60.51+1.4962.00
37LogisTech1r61.5461.54
38Quicktron Intelligent5r61.5361.53
39Dingqi Intelligent1r61.3961.39
40Skydio2r59.45+1.7861.23
41Ocado1r58.35+2.7861.13
42AGILOX4r60.9160.91
43Agilex2r60.8260.82
44Ati Motors7r60.4260.42
45Autel Robotics2r60.3960.39
46Peer Robotics3r60.3560.35
47Wesar Intelligence11r60.2160.21
48Mushiny6r59.9359.93
49Yinfu2r59.9259.92
50Xaxxon1r59.14+0.7559.89
157 ranked17 changed their own score this week

A maker is ranked here on its warehouse amr robots only. Not on its global rating, and not on its size. A company that is strong in one category and weak in another ranks differently on each board — that is the point of having one board per category.

Rank = best robot, plus credit for repeating it, plus news. The evidence part is the maker's best eligible warehouse amr robot plus up to 5 points once it fields 8 of them. The credit is capped, so a large catalogue cannot buy a rank — catalogue size partly measures how much of a maker we have collected, which is our business, not theirs. Every part is printed above: the RoboScore, the Momentum added to it, and the RoboIndex they sum to — with the best robot named on each of the top three cards.

Deployments and funding are not in this score. Seven in ten companies have no deployment record on file and funding is blank for exactly the makers a buyer trusts most, so ranking on them would rank our own reading rather than the market. Nothing here can be bought, claimed, or subscribed to.

RoboIndex is RoboScore + Momentum. News can raise a rank by up to 15 points and can never lower one, so a maker with live events is ordered above one on the same evidence. Both parts are printed on the row, so a company sitting above a higher score always says why. A quiet maker keeps its full RoboScore: we have not measured silence, only failed to hear anything, and the two are not the same.

How we rank — the evidence behind every robot score these standings are built from.