1X NEO Beta vs 天链人形机器人T1
Side-by-side comparison of 1X NEO Beta (1X Technologies AS) and 天链人形机器人T1 (四川天链机器人股份有限公司) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
1X NEO BetaUS
天链人形机器人T1CN
Year First Available
- 1X NEO Beta2024
- 天链人形机器人T12024
Verified Deployments
- 1X NEO Beta0 Deployments
- 天链人形机器人T10 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- 1X NEO Beta$20,000
- 天链人形机器人T1Contact for quote
Battery / Shift Runtime
- 1X NEO Beta3 hrs
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Availability Status
- 1X NEO BetaACTIVE
- 天链人形机器人T1ACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- 1X NEO Beta1676 mm
- 天链人形机器人T1160 mm
Weight
- 1X NEO Beta29.9 kg
- 天链人形机器人T143 kg
Mobility Type
- 1X NEO Beta—
- 天链人形机器人T1bipedal
Humanoid Subtype
- 1X NEO Betabipedal
- 天链人形机器人T1full bipedal
Walking Speed
- 1X NEO Beta3.4 m/s
- 天链人形机器人T12.2 m/s
Terrain
- 1X NEO Betaindoor
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- 1X NEO Beta25 kg
- 天链人形机器人T18 kg
Payload (Peak)
- 1X NEO Beta—
- 天链人形机器人T116 kg
Total DOF
- 1X NEO Beta22
- 天链人形机器人T171
Hand DOF
- 1X NEO Beta22
- 天链人形机器人T13
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- 1X NEO BetaNVIDIA Robotics Platform
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Battery & Power
Runtime
- 1X NEO Beta3 hrs
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- 1X NEO Beta—
- 天链人形机器人T1prototype
Commercial
Price (USD)
- 1X NEO Beta$20,000
- 天链人形机器人T1Contact for quote
Price Tier
- 1X NEO Beta20-40K
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Pricing Model
- 1X NEO Betapurchase
- 天链人形机器人T1—
Applications
- 1X NEO Betaeldercare_assistance, hospitality, research
- 天链人形机器人T1research, hazardous_env
| 1X NEO Betahumanoid1X Technologies AS 61.8Trust Score | 天链人形机器人T1humanoid四川天链机器人股份有限公司 46.4Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | US | CN |
| Year First Available | 2024 | 2024 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $20,000 | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 3 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1676 mm | 160 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 29.9 kg | 43 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | bipedal | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 3.4 m/s | 2.2 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | — |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 25 kg | 8 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | — | 16 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 22 | 71 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 22 | 3 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | NVIDIA Robotics Platform | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 3 hrs | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $20,000 | Contact for quote |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 20-40K | — |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | — |
| Applications (values differ) | eldercare_assistance, hospitality, research | research, hazardous_env |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Arm DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Programming, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, SDK Languages, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
Trade-offs at a glance
About this comparison
1X NEO Beta vs 天链人形机器人T1 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.