1X NEO Beta vs TRON 1
Side-by-side comparison of 1X NEO Beta (1X Technologies AS) and TRON 1 (Shenzhen LimX Dynamics Technology Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
Year First Available
Verified Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
Battery / Shift Runtime
Availability Status
Physical Form Factor
Height
Weight
Mobility Type
Humanoid Subtype
Walking Speed
Running Capable
Terrain
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
Payload (Peak)
Total DOF
Arm DOF
Hand DOF
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
Compute Platform
Teleoperation
Programming
Battery & Power
Runtime
Battery Capacity
Charging Time
Charging Method
Battery Swap
Software
SDK Languages
ROS Support
Simulation Platforms
Open API
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
Commercial
Price (USD)
Price Tier
Pricing Model
Developer Unit Price
Delivery Lead Time
Warranty
Applications
 1X NEO Betahumanoid1X Technologies AS61.8Trust Score |  TRON 1humanoidShenzhen LimX Dynamics Technology Co., Ltd.44.6Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | US | CN |
| Year First Available | 2024 | 2024 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $20,000 | $15,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 3 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1676 mm | 84.5 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 29.9 kg | 20 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | hybrid |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | bipedal | research platform |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 3.4 m/s | 1 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | — | run capable |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 25 kg | 0 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | — | 15 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 22 | 19 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 22 | 0 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | NVIDIA Robotics Platform | 12th Gen Intel i3/16G/512G |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | — | 12th Gen i3 |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | — | joystick |
| Programming (values differ) | — | SDK |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 3 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | — | 0.2 kWh |
| Charging Time (values differ) | — | 1.5 hrs |
| Charging Method (values differ) | — | tethered |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | Python, C++ |
| ROS Support (values differ) | — | ros2 community |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | — | NVIDIA Isaac, Mujoco, Gazebo |
| Open API (values differ) | — | open rest |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $20,000 | $15,000 |
| Price Tier | 20-40K | 20-40K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | capex |
| Developer Unit Price (values differ) | — | $15,000 |
| Delivery Lead Time (values differ) | — | 1 mo |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 1 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | eldercare_assistance, hospitality, research | research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Stair Climbing, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Production Pilots
About this comparison
1X NEO Beta vs TRON 1 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.