Side-by-side comparison of 4 Axis SZGH-Arm-1832 Collaborative Robot (Shenzhen Guanhong Automation Co., Ltd.) and CR-35iA (FANUC) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country
Year First Available
Verified Deployments
Price Range (USD)
Availability Status
Payload
Max TCP Speed
Reach
Degrees of Freedom
Repeatability
Robot Weight
Mounting Options
Safety Rating
Force/Torque Sensing
Programming Interface
Fieldbus Protocols
Price (USD)
Warranty
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | Japan |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2015 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $78,750 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 6 kg | 35 kg |
| Max TCP Speed (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 1 m/s | 0.5 m/s |
| Reach (values differ) | 1,850 mm | 1,813 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 4 | 6 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.02 mm | ±0.04 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 165 kg | 990 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | ground, bracket, ceiling | — |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | — | ISO 9283 |
| Force/Torque Sensing | none | none |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Programming Interface (values differ) | — | teach_pendant |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | EtherCAT, Profinet, Ethernet/IP, OPC UA | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $78,750 USD |
| Warranty (values differ) | 2 yrs | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, IP Rating, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, No-Code Capable, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Lead Time
Frequently asked
4 Axis SZGH-Arm-1832 Collaborative Robot is made by Shenzhen Guanhong Automation Co., Ltd., based in CN. CR-35iA is made by FANUC, based in JP.
4 Axis SZGH-Arm-1832 Collaborative Robot grades A on the Robo Index. CR-35iA grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
4 Axis SZGH-Arm-1832 Collaborative Robot has a reach of 1500 mm. CR-35iA has a reach of 1813 mm.
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
4 Axis SZGH-Arm-1832 Collaborative Robot vs CR-35iA compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.
Other comparisons