7723 vs ECCE
Side-by-side comparison of 7723 (IQ机器人公司) and ECCE (The Robot Studio and ECCEROBOT Project) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Agriculture buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 7723humanoidIQ机器人公司—Trust Score |  ECCEhumanoidThe Robot Studio and ECCEROBOT Project—Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | France |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2018 | 2009 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $250,000 |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 80 mm | 1050 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 60 kg | 26 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | wheeled | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 0.4 m/s | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | mild_incline | both |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 70 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 6 | 60 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 2 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | — | 2 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | PC connected to a distributed microcontroller network by CAN bus or i2c |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | joystick | — |
| Programming (values differ) | code_ros, SDK | teleoperation |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | 0.9 kWh | — |
| Charging Method (values differ) | auto dock | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | code_ros, SDK | teleoperation |
| ROS Support (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Open API (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Reliability | ||
| IP Rating (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | IP65 | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $250,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | — | 150K+ |
| Applications (values differ) | cleaning | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Humanoid Subtype, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Runtime, Charging Time, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
7723 vs ECCE compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.