Side-by-side comparison of AGIBOT A2 (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and MagicBot Z1 (Magiclab Robotics Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Manufacturer Country
AGIBOT A2CNYear First Available
AGIBOT A22024Verified Deployments
AGIBOT A20 DeploymentsBattery / Shift Runtime
AGIBOT A2—Availability Status
AGIBOT A2ACTIVEHeight
AGIBOT A2—Mobility Type
AGIBOT A2—Humanoid Subtype
AGIBOT A2—Terrain
AGIBOT A2—Payload
AGIBOT A2—Payload (Peak)
AGIBOT A2—Total DOF
AGIBOT A2—Arm DOF
AGIBOT A2—Arm Reach
AGIBOT A2—Onboard Compute
AGIBOT A2—Compute Platform
AGIBOT A2—VLM Capable
AGIBOT A2—Imitation Learning
AGIBOT A2—Teleoperation
AGIBOT A2—Programming
AGIBOT A2—Runtime
AGIBOT A2—Charging Method
AGIBOT A2—Battery Swap
AGIBOT A2—Fall Recovery
AGIBOT A2—Human Detection Method
AGIBOT A2—SDK Languages
AGIBOT A2—Open API
AGIBOT A2—Deployment Maturity
AGIBOT A2—Applications
AGIBOT A2— AGIBOT A2humanoidAgibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.23.0Trust Score | MagicBot Z1humanoidMagiclab Robotics Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd. 22.3Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | CN | CN |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2024 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | — | 2 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | — | 136.9 mm |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | — | full bipedal |
| Terrain (values differ) | — | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 2 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | — | 3 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | — | 24 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 5 |
| Arm Reach (values differ) | — | 50 cm |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | 8-core high-performance CPU |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | — | 8-core high-performance CPU |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | — | onboard small |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | — | multi task |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | — | joystick |
| Programming (values differ) | — | code_python, teleoperation |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | — | 2 hrs |
| Charging Method (values differ) | — | manual swap |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | — | multi modal |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | code_python, teleoperation |
| Open API (values differ) | — | limited rest |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | beta pilot |
| Commercial | ||
| Applications (values differ) | — | research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Weight, Walking Speed, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Hand DOF, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Foundation Models, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, Price (USD), Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
AGIBOT A2 vs MagicBot Z1 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.