AGIBOT A2 Ultra vs Domo Robot
Side-by-side comparison of AGIBOT A2 Ultra (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and Domo Robot (MIT CSAIL) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
AGIBOT A2 UltraCN
Domo RobotUS
Year First Available
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- Domo Robot2005
Verified Deployments
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra0 Deployments
- Domo Robot0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
- AGIBOT A2 UltraACTIVE
- Domo RobotACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- Domo Robot864 mm
Weight
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- Domo Robot19.1 kg
Mobility Type
- AGIBOT A2 Ultrabipedal
- Domo Robot—
Humanoid Subtype
- AGIBOT A2 Ultrafull bipedal
- Domo Robotupper-body-only
Terrain
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- Domo Robotindoor
Payload & Dexterity
Total DOF
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- Domo Robot29
Arm DOF
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- Domo Robot6
Hand DOF
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- Domo Robot4
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- Domo Robot6 node Debian Linux cluster
Programming
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- Domo Robotcode_python, code_c++
Software
SDK Languages
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- Domo Robotcode_python, code_c++
Commercial
Applications
- AGIBOT A2 Ultramanufacturing_assembly
- Domo Robotresearch
| AGIBOT A2 UltrahumanoidAgibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd. 16.0Trust Score | Domo RobothumanoidMIT CSAIL 37.2Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | US |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2005 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | — | 864 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | — | 19.1 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | upper-body-only |
| Terrain (values differ) | — | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Total DOF (values differ) | — | 29 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 6 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | — | 4 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | 6 node Debian Linux cluster |
| Programming (values differ) | — | code_python, code_c++ |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | code_python, code_c++ |
| Commercial | ||
| Applications (values differ) | manufacturing_assembly | research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Walking Speed, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Runtime, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, IP Rating, Noise Level, Price (USD), Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
AGIBOT A2 Ultra vs Domo Robot compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.