AGIBOT A2 Ultra vs G1
Side-by-side comparison of AGIBOT A2 Ultra (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and G1 (Unitree Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
AGIBOT A2 UltraCN
G1CN
Year First Available
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- G12024
Verified Deployments
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra0 Deployments
- G10 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- G12 hrs
Availability Status
- AGIBOT A2 UltraACTIVE
- G1ACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- G1126 mm
Mobility Type
- AGIBOT A2 Ultrabipedal
- G1bipedal
Humanoid Subtype
- AGIBOT A2 Ultrafull bipedal
- G1full bipedal
Terrain
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- G1indoor
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- G13 kg
Total DOF
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- G117
Arm DOF
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- G17
Manipulation Repeatability
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- G1±0.5 mm
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- G1100 TOPS
Compute Platform
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- G1NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16GB
Foundation Models
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- G1UnifoLM-WMA-0
Programming
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- G1code_python, code_ros
Battery & Power
Runtime
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- G12 hrs
Software
SDK Languages
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- G1Python, C++, ROS2
ROS Support
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- G1ros2 vendor
Simulation Platforms
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- G1NVIDIA Isaac Sim
Open API
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- G1open rest
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- G1production pilot
Commercial
Applications
- AGIBOT A2 Ultramanufacturing_assembly
- G1research_development
| AGIBOT A2 UltrahumanoidAgibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd. 16.0Trust Score | G1humanoidUnitree Robotics —Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | CN | CN |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2024 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | — | 2 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | — | 126 mm |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype | full bipedal | full bipedal |
| Terrain (values differ) | — | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 3 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | — | 17 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 7 |
| Manipulation Repeatability (values differ) | — | ±0.5 mm |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | 100 TOPS |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | — | NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16GB |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | — | UnifoLM-WMA-0 |
| Programming (values differ) | — | code_python, code_ros |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | — | 2 hrs |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | Python, C++, ROS2 |
| ROS Support (values differ) | — | ros2 vendor |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | — | NVIDIA Isaac Sim |
| Open API (values differ) | — | open rest |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | production pilot |
| Commercial | ||
| Applications (values differ) | manufacturing_assembly | research_development |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Weight, Walking Speed, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, VLM Capable, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, Price (USD), Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
AGIBOT A2 Ultra vs G1 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.