AGIBOT A2 Ultra vs GuRoo
Side-by-side comparison of AGIBOT A2 Ultra (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and GuRoo (University of Queensland) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
AGIBOT A2 UltraCN
GuRoo—
Year First Available
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- GuRoo2001
Verified Deployments
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra0 Deployments
- GuRoo0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
- AGIBOT A2 UltraACTIVE
- GuRooACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- GuRoo1200 mm
Weight
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- GuRoo38 kg
Mobility Type
- AGIBOT A2 Ultrabipedal
- GuRoo—
Humanoid Subtype
- AGIBOT A2 Ultrafull bipedal
- GuRoobipedal
Terrain
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- GuRooindoor
Payload & Dexterity
Total DOF
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- GuRoo23
Arm DOF
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- GuRoo3
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- GuRooVIA C3 1.2 GHz
Commercial
Applications
- AGIBOT A2 Ultramanufacturing_assembly
- GuRooresearch
| AGIBOT A2 UltrahumanoidAgibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd. 16.0Trust Score | GuRoohumanoidUniversity of Queensland 27.9Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2001 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | — | 1200 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | — | 38 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | bipedal |
| Terrain (values differ) | — | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Total DOF (values differ) | — | 23 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 3 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | VIA C3 1.2 GHz |
| Commercial | ||
| Applications (values differ) | manufacturing_assembly | research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Walking Speed, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload, Payload (Peak), Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Programming, Runtime, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, SDK Languages, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, IP Rating, Noise Level, Price (USD), Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
AGIBOT A2 Ultra vs GuRoo compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.