AGIBOT A2 Ultra vs NimbRo-OP2X
Side-by-side comparison of AGIBOT A2 Ultra (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and NimbRo-OP2X (NimbRo) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
AGIBOT A2 UltraCN
NimbRo-OP2XDE
Year First Available
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- NimbRo-OP2X2020
Verified Deployments
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra0 Deployments
- NimbRo-OP2X0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
- AGIBOT A2 UltraACTIVE
- NimbRo-OP2XACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- NimbRo-OP2X1350 mm
Weight
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- NimbRo-OP2X19 kg
Mobility Type
- AGIBOT A2 Ultrabipedal
- NimbRo-OP2Xbipedal
Humanoid Subtype
- AGIBOT A2 Ultrafull bipedal
- NimbRo-OP2Xresearch platform
Terrain
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- NimbRo-OP2Xindoor
Payload & Dexterity
Total DOF
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- NimbRo-OP2X18
Arm DOF
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- NimbRo-OP2X3
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- NimbRo-OP2XOn-board computer with GPU
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- NimbRo-OP2Xprototype
Commercial
Applications
- AGIBOT A2 Ultramanufacturing_assembly
- NimbRo-OP2Xresearch, human-robot interaction
| AGIBOT A2 UltrahumanoidAgibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd. 16.0Trust Score | NimbRo-OP2XhumanoidNimbRo 51.5Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | DE |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2020 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | — | 1350 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | — | 19 kg |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | research platform |
| Terrain (values differ) | — | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Total DOF (values differ) | — | 18 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 3 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | On-board computer with GPU |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Applications (values differ) | manufacturing_assembly | research, human-robot interaction |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Walking Speed, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload, Payload (Peak), Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Programming, Runtime, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, SDK Languages, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, Price (USD), Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
AGIBOT A2 Ultra vs NimbRo-OP2X compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.