AGIBOT A2 Ultra vs Ribo
Side-by-side comparison of AGIBOT A2 Ultra (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and Ribo (RoboSUST) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
AGIBOT A2 UltraCN
Ribo—
Year First Available
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- Ribo2017
Verified Deployments
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra0 Deployments
- Ribo0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- Ribo4 hrs
Availability Status
- AGIBOT A2 UltraACTIVE
- RiboACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Weight
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- Ribo1.3 kg
Height
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- Ribo1290 mm
Mobility Type
- AGIBOT A2 Ultrabipedal
- Ribo—
Humanoid Subtype
- AGIBOT A2 Ultrafull bipedal
- Ribo—
Walking Speed
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- Ribo2 m/s
Terrain
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- Riboindoor
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- Ribo40 kg
Total DOF
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- Ribo16
Compute & AI
Programming
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- Ribocode_ros
Battery & Power
Runtime
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- Ribo4 hrs
Software
SDK Languages
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- Ribocode_ros
ROS Support
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- RiboYes
Commercial
Applications
- AGIBOT A2 Ultramanufacturing_assembly
- Ribocleaning
| AGIBOT A2 UltrahumanoidAgibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd. 16.0Trust Score | RibohumanoidRoboSUST 46.5Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2017 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | — | 4 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Weight (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | — | 1.3 kg |
| Height (values differ) | — | 1290 mm |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 2 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | — | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 40 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | — | 16 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Programming (values differ) | — | code_ros |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | — | 4 hrs |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | code_ros |
| ROS Support (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Commercial | ||
| Applications (values differ) | manufacturing_assembly | cleaning |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm DOF, Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Onboard Compute, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, IP Rating, Noise Level, Price (USD), Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
Trade-offs at a glance
About this comparison
AGIBOT A2 Ultra vs Ribo compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.